How we compare
We compare services on five criteria, each of which a reader can check for themselves in minutes: the total price for the whole subscription period, whether a cancellation button exists in the account, how profiles are verified, whether profiles are visible to search engines, and how the charge appears on a bank statement. We give no overall star rating: that would require weighing the criteria against each other, and the weights depend on the person, not on the service.
What makes a criterion a criterion
A criterion is only meaningful when you can check it yourself and get the same answer regardless of the mood of whoever is checking.
On that test, almost everything written in ranking lists falls away immediately. “Convenient interface”, “quality user base”, “high success rate” are claims that can neither be confirmed nor refuted.
We kept five criteria, each checkable without special knowledge, and noted beside each one how long the check takes.
The five criteria and how to check them
Total price for the whole subscription period. Check: on the price page, look for the total rather than “€/month”. If there is no total, multiply the monthly price by the number of months in the plan. Two minutes. Why it matters: this is the only price figure that actually leaves your card.
Ending the subscription. Check: look in the interface before paying for both the withdrawal function and the route to terminate, and check the notice period in the terms. Three minutes. Why it matters: since 19 June 2026 an online order must carry a withdrawal function for the fourteen-day right, termination must work at least in the same channels used to subscribe, and a notice period longer than one month is unlawful in Finland.
Profile verification. Check: look at what exactly is verified — email, phone, or a selfie check. One minute. Why it matters: only selfie verification genuinely prevents the use of someone else’s photographs; the rest can be worked around in five minutes.
Visibility in search engines. Check: open the service’s address with /robots.txt on the end. Thirty seconds. Why it matters: the differences between sites are large, and this settles the privacy question.
How the charge appears on a statement. Check: look at the payment method — app store, payment intermediary, or a direct card charge. One minute. Why it matters: it determines what is seen by anyone with access to the statement.
- Total price for the period — 2 minutes
- Cancellation button and notice period — 3 minutes
- How profiles are verified — 1 minute
- Profile visibility in search engines — 30 seconds
- How the charge appears on a bank statement — 1 minute
What we do not measure, and why
User numbers. No service publishes how many active users it has, and the counting method is not disclosed anywhere. Figures such as “over 40 000 active users” appear on front pages, but they cannot be verified: there is no external audit in this industry.
The share of successful matches. It cannot be checked even in principle, and nobody has tried.
The quality of the user base. It is not measurable and means something different to everyone.
How convenient the interface is. Subjective, changes with every app update, and depends on habits.
We name these things not because they do not matter, but because ranking lists are usually built on exactly them — and that is what makes those lists impossible to check.
Why there is no overall rating
Giving a service a single score would mean weighing the criteria against each other: how much more important price is than privacy, or verification than the size of the user base.
But the weights depend on the person, not on the service. For someone searching in Helsinki, the number of users decides almost everything. For someone in a small town who is afraid of being seen by people they know, profile visibility in search engines matters more. A single score is someone else’s priorities presented as objectivity.
Separately: such a score goes out of date entirely and all at once. One service changes its price and the whole page is already wrong, while looking just as convincing as before.
So we give the criteria and the way to check them, and the reader does the weighing. And that is why the outcome may be “none of these will suit you” — our pages have “who this is not for” sections, which no ranking list has.
Does the commission affect the order
It does not, and you can check that against the published criteria — they are above on this page in full, not in the form of a promise.
We do not compile “best of” lists precisely because in those the order is usually decided by the size of the commission. You can see this on other people’s lists yourself: hover over a link and see whether it goes to the service’s own site or to a short unfamiliar domain, which is an affiliate network’s tracking link.
If you find a claim here that the cited source does not support, write to us and we will correct it.
Frequently asked
What criteria do you compare services on?
Five checkable ones: the total price for the whole subscription period, the cancellation button and notice period, how profiles are verified, whether profiles are visible to search engines, and how the charge appears on a statement. Beside each we note how long the check takes — from 30 seconds to 3 minutes.
Why do you not give star ratings?
Because an overall score would require weighing the criteria against each other, and the weights depend on the person. For someone searching in Helsinki, user numbers decide it; for someone afraid of being seen by people they know, profile visibility in search engines does. A single score is someone else’s priorities presented as objectivity.
Why do you not say how many users a service has?
Because no service publishes it and the counting method is not disclosed. Figures such as “over 40 000 active users” appear on front pages, but there is no external audit in this industry and they cannot be verified. We do not publish figures that cannot be checked.
Can the result of a comparison be “none of these fits”?
Yes, and our pages have their own “who this is not for” sections. Ranking lists do not have such sections, because they get in the way of selling. We think an honest “you do not need this” is more useful to a reader than a pre-selected option.
1093 words
- Business ID
- 3479337-9
- Address
- 11130 Riihimäki
- info@treffikone.fi
- Registered
- 9.10.2024 · VAT registered
These details match the trade register entry. The publisher name and full address can be verified free of charge by business ID: open the register record